The Reality of Political Realism Essay -- What is Politics?

When discussing whether or not a nation-state should enter a war and when to do so, three beliefs on contrasted policy and war exist. The three different diplomaticalal stances are that of pacifism, honorable war theory, and political realism. Political realism, or realpolitik as it is much referred to, is the belief war should only occur when it is in the national post of the particular nation-state. Henry Kissinger, a political realist, in his book diplomatic negotiations argues that realism is the only logical answer. Just war theorisers, along with pacifists, on the other hand oppose these arguments and therefore refresh of this form of diplomatic action. To construct a valid understanding of the realist perspective the arguments Kissinger puts forth in his book Diplomacy will be examined, and then a critique of those arguments will be declareed through a hardly war theorist perspective.Policy differences between Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt lead to different ac tions and desires. These differences were substantial, and so were their different views on foreign policy. Roosevelt became a president more determined to lead the get together States (US) by its national inte balances. Roosevelt was the first president to insist it was Americas duty to accomplish its influence felt globally. Although, Roosevelt only intended to relate the US to the rest of the world through the USs national interests. Roosevelt envisioned the US as a power like no other and felt obligated to immerse on its strengths to prevail against other countries as necessary if their interests collided. Whether those strengths be that of embargo, diplomatic actions, or hostile confrontation, Roosevelt believed if it was in the nations interest to attain this particular mark then so be it. I... ...on-states that held the same religious beliefs. Europe maintained peace through a balance of power from the nineteenth degree centigrade to the early twentieth century. This b alance of power was enacted following the conclusion of the 30 years war. For as perfect as realpolitik is the reoccurring problem of it is the situation you cannot separate humans from morality. Inevitably making political realism unimaginable as a form of diplomacy that could be widely accepted. To fight down the United States in an occupation against Canada because it would widely help American economics, offer resources, etc. would evidently be the right thing to do harmonise to realpolitik. Yet, moralistic Americans view Canadians as their allies and neighbors. There is no just reason to wage war with Canada. A just reason ground on morals will be more widely support than that of just national interests.