One Proposed Maxim as a Universal Law Essay

1. State your proposed mould as a maximI testament take ZAR 620 000 000.00 (A) when Ive d unitary a years work (C) in rear to get real(a)ly, really rich (E).2. fictionalize this maxim as a universal faithfulnessAll raft (7 billion of them) go out take ZAR 620 000 000.00 when theyve done a years work in order to get really, really rich.3.Ask whether your maxim is liable in a world ruled by the universal law In a real world if individuals put one everywhereed 620million for a long time worth of work there are bound to be extensive ontogenesiss of income and spending going around the markets. A downfall of the economy leave occur due to business halt in the competing of prices. People will be greedy and will want everything that money could possibly bargain for which will result in shortages of products and services. Market demand and supply will cease to exist. In conclusion, this maxim is not conceivable in the real world ruled by universal law. 4. Ask whether you would rationally act on your maxim in such a world. IF I had to earn 620million one years worth of work,I would honestly be over indulging and over spending money on unnecessary somatic items and food. Eventually I would be following an unhealthy lifestyle resulting in many health related problems like stress, obesity and so forth. Of line of reasoning I would be really rich But what would my purpose be thereafter? I therefore would never act rationally in such a world.Step 2 Form an opinionOn the basis of your analysis, answer the following questionsWhat would Kant probably have said to the highest degree Whitey Bassons (or you) earning ZAR 620,000,000.00? (You might want to do a bit of explore into the nature of Whitey Bassons 2010 earnings). According to Kants theory this would be categorize as morally binding. A talented guy like bassoon is repulsively rare. I designate that this earnings would be seen as an imperfect duty, because this depends on the preference of humankind. Whitey Basson cultivated his own talent by commit his good education and remarkable people skills into building the business and qualification it the most successful one today. Kant would therefore accept the earnings for honky has not stolen from anyone or broken any rules. He reaped the rewards of his benefits.What do you think about Whitey Basson (or you) earning ZAR 620,000,000.00? However, It is unfair to look at them as one years income, as those were realize over 40 years. So he deserved to be compensable a huge centre for his enormous talent and knowledge ingrowing the business into a successful one. They make 50m-60m sales a month in vii jurisdictions. It is fair to be rewarded for such hard work and dedication only if not in such large percentage increases especially when the arouse of the economy is not as rapid as the percentage increase in income.Why do you think this?These figures make no smack of the argument that companies need to pay such vast amounts in or der to retain top skills, because more than 20 of the top 100 highest paid executives in 2010 are no longer in their positions today. According to a source Figures proved that South Africa was a rich country, but the statistical distribution of that wealth left just 20 people owning R112.2 billion, while 48 percent of South Africans were living below the poverty level of R322 a month. Sixteen percent of employed workers earned less than R500, 33.4 percent earned less than R1 000 and 60 percent earned less than R2 500 a month